News Summary

The U.S. House of Representatives has passed President Trump’s tax and spending bill, known as the ‘One Big Beautiful Bill,’ by a narrow margin of 218-214. While the legislation promises broad tax cuts and spending reductions, it faces criticism for potential impacts on Medicaid and essential social programs. Michigan Republicans largely support the bill, citing its benefits, while Democrats warn of its harmful consequences for vulnerable populations. The bill is projected to increase the federal deficit significantly and mainly benefit the wealthiest Americans.

Washington D.C. – The U.S. House of Representatives has narrowly passed President Donald Trump’s federal tax and spending bill, dubbed the “One Big Beautiful Bill,” with a vote of 218-214. This legislation is now heading to President Trump’s desk for a signature, expected to occur on July 4, 2025. The vote demonstrates a significant victory for House Speaker Mike Johnson and Senate Majority Leader John Thune after weeks of internal disagreements within the Republican Party.

The bill aims to implement broad tax cuts and spending reductions, but it has come under fire for its potential impacts on vital social programs. Critics warn the legislation could cut millions off Medicaid, shifting financial responsibilities to the states. In Michigan, the Republican congressional delegation has thrown its full support behind the bill, celebrating the potential benefits it could bring.

U.S. Rep. John James from Michigan, who is also vying for the GOP gubernatorial nomination in 2026, has highlighted key aspects of the bill such as tax cuts affecting tips and overtime, along with the protection of Social Security and solidification of immigration policies. His colleague, U.S. Rep. Lisa McClain, has defended the bill’s focus on ensuring that Medicaid funds only benefit the most vulnerable populations, labeling concerns raised by Democrats as “fear mongering.”

Support among Michigan Republicans is widespread, with U.S. Rep. Bill Huizenga calling the bill a vital step for the country’s future. U.S. Rep. Tim Walberg noted that the bill represents significant conservative reforms in education and government spending, while U.S. Rep. Tom Barrett expressed optimism the legislation would prevent substantial tax hikes and lower energy costs.

Michigan House Speaker Matt Hall described the bill as a substantial victory for working families in Michigan, suggesting it would help them retain more of their paychecks. However, opposition from Michigan Democrats is robust. Critics have denounced the legislation, claiming it poses a threat to vulnerable populations through cuts to Medicaid and food assistance programs. U.S. Rep. Kristen McDonald Rivet has called the package an extreme measure likely to increase costs for Michigan families and lead to significant repercussions regarding healthcare and food security.

Additionally, U.S. Rep. Rashida Tlaib characterized the bill as “an act of violence against our communities,” stressing its potential to inflict unnecessary suffering for thousands. U.S. Rep. Shri Thanedar has pointed out the negative impact on constituents who rely on Medicaid and food assistance. Concerns have also been raised by U.S. Rep. Haley Stevens regarding cuts to manufacturing investments and potential closures of rural hospitals that may be initiated by the bill.

Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries made headlines by delivering a record-breaking 8-hour speech opposing the bill, emphasizing its harmful implications for the well-being of the American public. Financially, the bill is projected to add $3.3 trillion to the federal deficit over the next decade and reduce health coverage for approximately 11.8 million Americans. Notably, it is estimated that the wealthiest 20% of Americans will receive over 70% of the bill’s net tax cuts, while the bottom 20% would garner less than 1%.

Governor Gretchen Whitmer has voiced her criticism, denouncing the legislation as one that primarily benefits the wealthy while jeopardizing the economic stability of many Michigan residents. The effects of the bill will be closely monitored, with advocacy groups and Democratic leaders planning to remind voters of the Republicans’ support for the bill throughout upcoming elections.