Men Plead No Contest in Detroit Voter Intimidation Case

News Summary

Jacob Wohl and John Burkman have pleaded no contest to multiple felony charges related to a robocall scheme aimed at misleading Detroit voters before the presidential election. The deceptive calls targeted nearly 12,000 residents, spreading false information about voting by mail and intimidating voters by claiming their personal data could be accessed by law enforcement. Both men face serious charges and potential prison time, with their sentencing scheduled for December. The case highlights ongoing concerns regarding voter intimidation and misinformation in electoral processes.

Detroit — Two men, Jacob Wohl, 27, and John “Jack” Burkman, 59, have pleaded no contest to multiple felony charges stemming from a robocall scheme designed to mislead voters in Detroit prior to the 2020 presidential election. The announcement of their plea was made by the Michigan Attorney General’s office on August 1.

The robocalls, which targeted nearly 12,000 residents in late August 2020, disseminated false information regarding voting by mail. The recordings misled recipients into believing that their personal data would be compromised, suggesting it could be accessed by law enforcement and credit card companies. Furthermore, the calls falsely claimed that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) would utilize voting records to impose mandatory vaccinations.

Wohl and Burkman faced serious charges, including voter intimidation, conspiracy to violate election law, and employing a computer to commit these offenses. A no contest plea allows defendants to accept potential penalties without admitting guilt. The maximum sentences for these charges could reach up to seven years in prison, with their sentencing scheduled for December 1 in Wayne County 3rd Circuit Court.

William Amadeo, the defense attorney representing Wohl and Burkman, indicated that their plea agreement could safeguard their freedom. The implications of their actions extended beyond Michigan, as similar robocall schemes were also recorded in other states, including Ohio, leading to additional legal challenges. A federal judge concluded that these robocalls breached several civil rights laws on both state and federal levels across multiple states, including Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, New York, and Illinois. Consequently, the Federal Communications Commission has proposed fines amounting to $5.1 million against both individuals.

Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel underscored that deceptive practices intended to suppress voter participation, particularly targeting marginalized communities, would not be tolerated. Initially, Wohl and Burkman contested the charges, arguing that their activities were safeguarded under free speech principles. However, these claims were consistently rejected by higher courts. The Michigan Supreme Court ultimately remanded the case to the Court of Appeals, which determined that the allegations against them were not protected under free speech rights.

In addition to facing charges in Michigan, Wohl and Burkman are also dealing with the repercussions of their actions in a separate case where they agreed to pay as much as $1.25 million for fraudulent activities in New York and Ohio. Prior to the 2020 election, both men were actively involved in political campaigns and had financially supported their robocall initiative aimed at influencing voter behavior.

The legal outcome of this case reflects the growing concern over voter intimidation and misinformation tactics, particularly in an era where maintaining public trust in electoral processes is paramount. As states continue to adapt and respond to such unlawful actions, the implications of this case may serve as a precedent for future legal challenges linked to voter protection and the integrity of elections.

Deeper Dive: News & Info About This Topic

HERE Resources

Men Plead No Contest in Voter Intimidation Case

Additional Resources

• Detroit Free Press
• Metro Times
• WUSA9
• Wikipedia: Voter Intimidation
• Encyclopedia Britannica: Voting